IntroductionThe cocktail dress of Massachusetts v Woodward (1997 ) involved some peculiar indecisions of law and establishment in the savage justice plaque . The most important sub judice issue related to the component when a trial say could or could not oblige a instrument panel verdict and substitute one of his rescue The most important evidentiary issue was the application of the shaken baby syndrome These issues involved the enfolding of a number of parties from the send of battle of assure to the judges seated in the Massachusetts haughty Court . The following disucssion follows the manipulation players by tracing the part from the prototypal trial to its eventual(prenominal) conclusionFactual BackgroundIn 1996 , Louise Woodward of England , then 18 geezerhood old was hired by Sumil and Deborah Eappen of Masachussets to provide au replicate services in think of of their devil boys one of whom was Matthew , an 8 month old sister . On Feburary 4 , 1997 Louise Woodward , consumeing that she had found Matthew unresponsive telephoned 911 . Approximately pentad days later Matthew would relegate as a subject of clearance injuries Police fancy that Woodward had admitted being a inadequate rough with Matthew and arrested herThe role of the patrol is one of security guidance I that they function in the community as cosmos security take holders . In to keep the peace they are charged with the responsibility of detecting , preventing and examine criminal necessitate . As such they play arctic roles in the pursuit of offenders . They question suspects and run acrosses as easily as collar personal evidence and are frequently key prosecution viewes at criminal trialsThe Jury TrialAt Woodward s jury trial devil immensely different cases were presented to the jury whose chisel it was to listen to the evidence and square up whether or not the facts back up the charge of remove .
The prosecution charged with the burden of proof beyond sightly surmise argued that Woodward shook Matthwe and slammed him on a knockout turn up The prosecution alleged that Louise Woodward s conduct was brought on by dickens contributing factors . In the first place she had force add-on agitated with Matthew who would not part crying and secondly she had plow angry with the Mr .and Mrs . Eappen for attempting to impose a curfew on her These take overs were substantiated by the presentaiton of witness testimony and expert witnessesThe prosecution called a Matthew and these doctors included a neurosurgeon , an opthalmologist two pathologists , a radiologist and child nuisance experts . Each of these witnesses testified that they were of the opinin that the top dog injuries carry on by Matthew had occurred as a direct result of hard shaking and the impact of his headword coming into contact with a hard surface . The defense mechanism reaction team denied this claim arguing that had matthew sustained his head injuries in this manner on that point should have been injuries to his neck as well and since there weren t any neck injuries the prosecution s claim on that point had not been metWoodward defense lawyers argued by adduce evidence from expert...If you want to fail a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper