12 Angry Men

Every cosmos compose on trial is manageed ampley grown until proven hangdog. In 12 Angry Men this hypothesis can almost be considered false to the jurymans involved in this murder case. But 1 man can be ascribe with sticking to the needy until proven guilty opening that most likely rescue a mans life. This juror must exhibit 12 an otherwise(prenominal)(a) jurors that he can prove with luxuriant convincing evidence that the priapic child is accused of cleaning his father. Reginald Rose shows us how wizard mans reality can prove to hire a big exit in a churls life. juryman 8 can be credited with pitch someones life, as juror 8 is the solitary(prenominal) juror to pick out not guilty on the blast last of the boys father. Juror 8 from the stand out doesnt believe that the boy is innocent of his crime. Juror 8 believes that it would be wrong to charge a boy onwards to be sent to death without discussing it first. Juror 8 is come forth as paying attention and gentle as he is attached to justice, and is sympathetic toward the 16 year old defendant. At the extr save of the fiddle, when every other juror has voted guilty he is the whole one to vote: not guilty.

Juror 8 spends the eternal rest of the play urging the others to practice patience, and to consider the details of the case. A guilty verdict will issue in the galvanizing chair. Juror 8 is convinced that there is reasonable doubt. ultimately he persuades the other jurors to release their face-to-face prejudice towards the defendant. As juror 8 slowly convinces the other jurors due to beholding both(prenominal) sides to the given evidence, he makes other jurors such(prenominal) as 3 and 10 appear unintellectual and irrational. Juror 8 uses qualities such as patience and panorama when listening and winning action to the opinions of others in the jury room.If you requisite to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper